Part of being a lawyer who practices in the Susquehanna Valley all the way to the Lehigh Valley involves driving.  A lot of driving.  York, where my main office is located, is an hour and a half to my other office in Allentown on a good day, and you all know how rare good traffic days are lately.

Fortunately, I have a satellite radio in my car and one of my guilty pleasures is the Blue Collar Comedy Station (Sirius/XM station 97).  It keeps me laughing when I’m wishing I had a rocket launcher on the hood of my Kia.


The other day I heard comedian Don Friesen for the first time.  His bit, “You got the money?” had me laughing.  Don suggested doing things that have crossed my mind when dealing with debt collectors, something that I do every day for my clients.  His perspective, though, was that of a debtor and not a debtor’s attorney with a big mallet to whack misbehaving debt collectors.

The bit is truly hilarious, and there is a link to it right here.

The first thing Don mentioned is that the collection agencies intimidated him, as if they worked for the mob.  Don’t let them intimidate you!  There is a specific set of laws called
the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) that debt collectors must follow or they will be subjected to civil penalties that start at $1000 per violation (if you think you have been harassed by a debt collector, please email and we can discuss it further) plus attorneys fees and court costs.  Acting like a dirtbag can sometimes cost the debt collector more than the balance they are trying to collect, don’t let the debt collectors intimidate you, they are bullies behind a telephone, not the mob.  

phone-angry1The next thing that pops up is that the debt collector spoke with Don and then said they’d call back in an hour.  Unless you give the debt collector permission, such as offering a call back time, a debt collector is only allowed one contact per day.  It is a grey area whether or not a voice-mail is considered contact, but in this scenario, the debt collector called and asked if Don had the money, then told him they would call back in an hour but called back in 10 minutes.  What could have changed in 10 minutes?

If a debt collector says they are going to call back in an hour, you should explicitly tell them not to call back the rest of the day, if you don’t, they may be able to get around the one contact per day policy.  This is another grey area, I think it is a violation of the FDCPA to bully a consumer by telling them you are going to call back in an hour rather than ask permission, but there is certainly room for debate on that one.

The next question the debt collector asks is “can you borrow it from someone.”  I don’t ever recommend borrowing from Peter to pay Paul.  Let’s face it, owing anyone money sucks, I’d rather owe money to Mastercard than mom.  You can hang up on Mastercard, how did it go the last time you hung up on your mom? (For the record my mother is Italian, and I’m not saying Italian mothers are world-class experts at guilt, but I’m not not saying it either.)  Did you not regret it in under 30 seconds and call her back and apologize profusely?  I didn’t feel bad hanging up on Pete from Comcast the other day (and you were in India, not Indiana, do you think I’m stupid?).  Don’t borrow money to pay a debt, it would be like cutting the top of a blanket off and sewing it to the bottom in an attempt to make the blanket longer.  Asking you to borrow money to pay a balance is a favorite tactic of debt collectors, don’t get suckered into it.

A bit later into the bit, Don puts the debt collector on speaker-phone so his roommate can hear.  If you put the phone on speakerphone or allow a debt collector to speak to someone else about the account, that is fine, but if the debt collector speaks to a third party about your account without your permission, they have violated the FDCPA.  There is a possible exception about speaking to your spouse, but if a debt collector called my wife looking for me and mentioned that I was behind on a bill, that would tick me off.  I call that harassment, because they are setting me up to hear about it for eternity (I’m not really qualified to give marital advice, so don’t ask, but I can tell you what not to do.)  I don’t get these calls personally at this point in my life, but if it ever happened and they called my wife and disclosed information, they would have a lawsuit that would cause their eyes to bleed just by reading it.  If you give your roommate, spouse, dog the telephone and the debt collector discloses information, they are in the clear, but if they do it without your permission, that is an FDCPA violation.


Further along, Don pulls his credit report and lo and behold, its in rough shape.  He comments that even if he could he isn’t paying them now, he’s just going bankrupt.  Going bankrupt is a big decision, and a bad credit report usually isn’t a good enough reason in and of itself to file bankruptcy.  (For more information on what to think about when considering bankruptcy, click here).

Close to the end, Don joked that he got so mad at one guy he wrote him a check for nothing.  He probably was OK doing this, but tendering any payment can revive a time-barred debt, so be careful that your joke doesn’t revive an old account.  In Pennsylvania, the statute of limitations on debt is four years, which means if there hasn’t been a payment for fourt years, the creditor loses the right to sue to collect the account, but there is a dirty tactic that is being employed by debt-buyers.  They will call a debtor and say that for as little of a payment of $5, they can keep the account from going to the legal department.  What the debtor doesn’t know that the debt is already time-barred, and by making that $5 payment, they have revived the debt.

If even the tiniest payment is made on a time-barred account, it restarts the statute of limitations timer to four years, even if the first timer had run out.  

Sending a check for $0 or even a penny might seem like sweet revenge, but that revenge might cost you.

If you find yourself getting calls from debt collectors and it seems overwhelming, you don’t have to deal with them alone, call the Allentown office at 610-928-1233 or the York office at 717-855-2309 or email for a free consultation.   You don’t have to do this alone.  


Recently I had a client come into my York, PA office with a credit card lawsuit.  He had been sued for a credit card that he stopped paying on a little more than three years ago.  Thirty-eight months to be exact.

In PennsylvaniaPast Due Bill, the statute of limitations on debt is four years (42 Pa. C.S. 5525(a)), and the complaint was served with a copy of the signed credit card agreement (I hadn’t seen a hard-signed agreement in years).  

My client thought he was sunk.  There were a couple of problems with this.  First of all, it wasn’t the original credit card, Aria, suing him.  Secondly, the contract was very difficult to read, with most of it in four-point font.  Always check the fine print!

The first thing I looked at was the sales agreement from Aria to the debt-buyer.  The agreement was proper and unlike a lot of other agreements, it actually indicated the account number as one of the accounts sold.  There was no debate that the account had been properly sold to the debt buyer.

These guys are getting better, I thought as I got a magnifying glass out to read the agreement.  I was looking for a choice of law clause which is a tactic that I have used in court before.  

Most of the time, the choice of law clause indicates that South Dakota or Ohio law is the body of law that governs the credit card agreement, but on this particular Aria credit card, the law of the Commonwealth of Virginia is what governs the agreement.Game Over

Virginia’s statute of limitations on debt is three years, so if Virginia’s law is applied, the debt is time-barred.

So did the judge buy it?  Yes, the judge bought that argument and the case was dismissed.  Sometimes the fine print works in the consumer’s favor.  Most of the time it doesn’t though, so if you find yourself being sued by a debt-buyer or a credit card company, feel free to email me at or call 610-928-1233 for a free consultation.


Can an FDCPA Complaint Be Generated By An Improper Proof of Claim?

June 13, 2013

As I have discussed many times, a proof of claim in Chapter 13 bankruptcy is filed by a creditor seeking to be paid for their debt.   When a proof of claim is invalid, I will object to that proof of claim, and often times I save my clients thousands of dollars when the claim is […]

Read the full article →

Advice on Raising Daughters, Because No One Is An Expert, We Are All Just Learning

June 12, 2013

This post isn’t going to be about Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy.  It isn’t going to be me spiking the football about another flawless victory in court.  I’m not going to have any insight on personal finance (well maybe a tiny bit) and this is unlikely to make any law journal, magazine, or even […]

Read the full article →

Awesome New Tactics In Objecting To Proofs Of Claim in Pennsylvania Bankruptcy Cases

June 4, 2013

One of the most important aspects of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is the proof of claim. As I explained in a previous post, a proof of claim is what a creditor files to get paid in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. One of the things I do better than any attorney in this district is object […]

Read the full article →

But If I File Bankruptcy They Will Take All My Stuff…

June 3, 2013

That would be right unless your replaced all of with NONE OF. That’s right, in most Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy cases, the trustee (the man or woman appointed to supervise your case) cannot take anything from you. The reason they can’t is something in Bankruptcy law called exemptions. An exemption is something you […]

Read the full article →

Driving an Old Car Into Bankruptcy, Why That Old Car May Actually Help You Qualify

May 30, 2013

I’m not having a great day with cars.  My 2002 Chevy just popped up a warning lamp, and anyone who has experience with the Chevy Venture knows that it is very much a money-pit. I have written previously about not driving a new car into bankruptcy and I’m definitely not against people driving nice cars […]

Read the full article →

Foreclosure Lawsuit: Anything That Could Have Been Done Wrong Was

May 21, 2013

Pennsylvania is a judicial foreclosure state.  What that means is for a lender to foreclose on your home, they must get approval from a judge to foreclose. The first step to foreclosing in Lehigh County is to file an Act 91 notice.  An Act 91 notice is a notification from your lender that you have […]

Read the full article →

In Defending a Mortgage Foreclosure Case, Ask What Is Missing?

January 8, 2013

I hate to admit it, but foreclosure attorneys in Pennsylvania are getting better… much better. Mistakes that were being made three years ago aren’t happening anymore.  Now when I get a foreclosure action to defend, I no longer have the automatics to fall back on. The automatics are things opposing counsel did every time that […]

Read the full article →

Debt Collectors Make New Year’s Resolutions Too and It Could Cost You Your Tax Refund!

January 2, 2013

Another year has come and gone.  It is time for reflection and for some, a time of redemption, but for most it is a time of resolutions. This is the year I’m finally going to lose forty pounds.  This is the year I’m finally going to learn to speak Klingon.  This is the year I’m […]

Read the full article →