Time For Bankruptcy To Turn The Next Chapter

by J. Kutkowski on July 8, 2010

It has been a while since I have posted, and I apologize for the silence, it was not intentional.  The law practice has been very busy and we hired one paralegal and will be hiring another paralegal at the end of this month.  This is a difficult but necessary decision, even for a certified control freak like me.

I’ve been thinking of ways to make the new Chapter 13 process work.  It seems like with the economic pinch the powers that be have determined to make Chapter 13 more difficult.

The first thing that jumps out is that we can no longer extend plans beyond 60 months.  Judges used to be given discretion to allow a 66 month or even longer length of plan, now we are stuck with 60, leaving bankruptcy attorneys to decide whether or not they want to do a balloon payment or do a step-up plan that they know their client can’t handle unless some financial miracle comes their way… in this economy the miracle man hasn’t been around often.

I think I have a solution, but it will require Republicans or Democrats (hereinafter referred to as Republicrats) to set aside their animus and ignore lobbyists from mortgage lenders.

The solution is to create a new Chapter in bankruptcy.  I vote for Chapter 15, but I don’t really care what it is called.

This would be a supervised repayment plan like Chapter 13 is, but instead of repaying it over 5 years, the past-due amount on the mortgage would be put on the end of the mortgage.

The mortgage would be reset to 31% of the debtor’s take home pay for five years, and the difference in the mortgage would be put to the end of the mortgage as well.

Take this example:

Joe & Susie Homebuyer have a mortgage at $1200 per month.  After being laid off for a year, Joe’s income dropped to $3000 from $5o00 (FYI I know women work too, but for mathematical purposes, assume Susie does not work outside the home).

Joe is now 10 months behind on his mortgage, which is $12,000.  He is looking at a sheriff sale and instead chooses to file Chapter 15 bankruptcy.  31% of Joe’s income is $930 per month.  The difference between $930 and $1200 over 60 months is $16,200.  (The reason I suggest 5 years is because this recession should be over in 5 years or less…hopefully).

The total amount of $28,200 gains interest at the rate the Federal Reserve Lends on a short term basis + 1% at the time of the case being filed (that is the rate mortgage lenders can borrow money from the Federal Reserve at).

Right now, that rate would be 1.25%, and over the course of 30 years the interest would be $5630 (rounded off from $5631.64).

That would put an endcap of $33830 on the end of the mortgage.  That endcap would also gain interest at the standard interest rate of the original mortgage.  Joe & Susie would pay $1217 per month for the remaining 30 months and then the mortgage would be paid off.

If Joe & Susie decide to move, they can sell their property and catch up the mortgage and the endcap interest.  If Joe & Susie still default and wind up getting foreclosed on, the endcap debt CANNOT be discharged in a Chapter 7 case.

There you go, the borrowers get relief, the lenders get security, and we don’t have 6 to 7 million homes foreclosed upon.

Next time I’ll be talking about a new kind of debt settlement, one that actually works (I guess I’ll have to put the snake away) and I’ll also brighten your day with some famous people who have filed bankruptcy.

Stay tuned…

{ 0 comments }

Foreclosure Crisis Ready to Strike Lehigh Valley

by J. Kutkowski on March 12, 2010

Here it comes folks.  I’ve been warning about this since October and believe me, I want to be wrong.

In April 2010, 50% of the adjustable jumbo-loans (mortgages over $417K) are set to adjust.

For the first two years of this foreclosure crisis, the lower and middle class residents of the Lehigh Valley bore the burden, but now the upper class homeowners are about to get hit.

This is how it is going to go down. 

Joe and Jane Homeowner have been paying a teaser rate of 2% or even just interest, resulting in a payment of $708 – $1570 per month.

The loans are going to reset, possibly to 6% or higher, resulting in a $1000 jump in payment.  This is happening at the same time as salaries shrink.

Pressure on salaries and the increasing home payment will result in the homeowner dipping into their savings and when the savings dry up, they will fall behind.

Already the effects are being seen of this and the tidal wave hasn’t really hit yet.

What is going to happen when 50% of jumbo loans begin the reset process?

The housing crisis is going to get worse, that’s what, because instead of a recovering housing market we will have downward depression on home values as these McMansions go onto the market at a discounted price.

Yesterday, I sent emails to Senator Arlen Specter and Representative Charlie Dent, the text of that email is here.

So far, Representative Dent has responded with an auto-email message that he got my message… thanks for that.

Senator Specter’s office has done even less.  Not even an auto-response saying I got the email.  Hello Senator Specter, its 2010, its called Aweber, it costs $20 a month and is based in Pennsylvania, I think you can afford it.

I didn’t expect a quick response, although I was hopeful as Representative Dent at least has been responsive in the past.

So now I’ve decided to throw down the gauntlet.  I’m not exactly Paul Revere riding through the city yelling the Red Coats are Coming!  I’m just a local bankruptcy attorney who is fed up with the lack of meaningful action by Congress in response to this crisis.  Instead they choose to drone on about Health Care, Cap and Trade, and exactly who is more evil, George Bush and the Republicans or Barack Obama and the Democrats.  This is one instance where I think Monty Brewster was right but instead of voting for None of the Above I’m going to vote for all of the above.

So here is the gauntlet. 

Senator Specter has two potential opponents in 2010, Joe Sestak and Pat Toomey.

Representative Dent has two potential opponents in November, John Callahan and Jake Towne.

So our current Congressmen as of now have not replied to my email, lets see what their opponents have to say about it.  Why can’t we have a meaningful bankruptcy overhaul in this economy.

I don’t know the answer to that question, but I do know that HAMP is not working.  I do know that the only way to stop foreclosures is to actually stop foreclosures, and so far only bankruptcy can assure that foreclosures are stopped.

I will report back to you the responses I get here.  Its time to turn the heat up and find out who the weasels actually are.

{ 3 comments }

Letter to Senator Specter and Representative Dent

March 11, 2010

This is the text of the email I am sending to Senator Arlen Specter and Representative Charlie Dent.  Charlie Dent is the representative from my district, the 15th, while Specter is Senator for the entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  Both were Republicans when they voted for BACPA, Specter changed parties last year.  Both face tough re-election [...]

Read the full article →

Supreme Court Says Lawyer’s Cannot Advise Clients to take on More Debt Prior to Filing, Or Does It?

March 11, 2010

The Supreme Court’s job is calling balls and strikes, and while I am not happy with their decision, they called the Milavetz case correctly.
The two things for the consumer to know is that BACPA (the act passed in 2005 that made bankruptcy more difficult and expensive) considers bankruptcy lawyers debt relief agencies and that bankruptcy [...]

Read the full article →

Driving a New Car Into Bankruptcy

March 8, 2010

Half of finance is common sense, and unfortunately as my father once told me, some of the worst accidents happen on the showroom floor.
My dad was a car guy.  He loved driving around in a long Cadillac or a Corvette.  He didn’t pass the desire for flashy cars to his son though, my Kia is [...]

Read the full article →

Can I File Bankruptcy After My First Case Was Dismissed?

March 4, 2010

A common question lately is “Can I file a new Chapter 13 bankruptcy case if my earlier Chapter 13 bankruptcy was dismissed.
The answer is probably.
There are only a few reasons why you could not file your case again and most of them revolve around abuse of the system.  If your case has been dismissed with [...]

Read the full article →

Give Your Creditors An Offer They Can’t Refuse

February 14, 2010

Some bitter people have said that Al Capone was the only person who knew how to celebrate Valentine’s Day appropriately.  For those who do not remember, Al Capone is believed to have led the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre where seven members of a rival gang were killed.
Al Capone gave his creditors an offer they couldn’t [...]

Read the full article →

Beware False Notifications of Chapter 13 Dismissals

February 9, 2010

Adrian Lapas posted about a debt settlement company is out there contacting people currently in Chapter 13 bankruptcy and claiming their case was dismissed.
Click Here To See Original Article
This is a slimy tactic tried by debt settlement companies to steal from you.  That’s right, other lawyers and professionals will call debt settlement a poor product, [...]

Read the full article →

Local Bankruptcy Attorney Saves Clients $10,000 on a Regular Basis!

February 8, 2010

Bankruptcy has a lot in common with the game of golf.  In bankruptcy and in golf, some of the most simple things can be frustrating.  In bankruptcy and in golf, there are a limited amount of clubs (tools) that the bankruptcy lawyer can use to advocate for his or her client.
One of my favorite clubs [...]

Read the full article →

What is a Proof of Claim in Bankruptcy?

February 8, 2010

A proof of claim in bankruptcy is a way for a creditor to get paid in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case.
Imagine a classroom full of desks.  At each of those desks there is a child, which represents one of your creditors.  A proof of claim is simply when one of these children raises their hand [...]

Read the full article →